Emprego da Próclise nos Textos dos Alunos da 12ª Classe do Liceu no 1152 em Caconda

Abstract

The work entitled ―Employment of Proclysis in the texts of Students of the 12th grade of Lyceum no 1152 in Caconda‖ has as research question: How do the students of the 12th grade of Lyceum no 1152 in Caconda use proclisis in their texts? To answer this aforementioned research question, the following general objective was formulated: Contribute to the study of proclisis in the texts of students in the 12th grade of Lyceum no 1152 in Caconda. We developed a theory of use of proclisis based on Cunha and Cintra (1984), Costa and Gil (1997), Mapasse (2005), Brito (2012), Miguel (2014), César (2014), Ulanowicz (2020), however , for data analysis we used the theory of Azeredo, Pinto and Lopes (2014) and according to these authors, the personal pronoun, in the complement forms, precedes the verbal form (in proclisis) when there is an element that attracts the pronoun para before the verb. After analyzing the data, we found that no case was found related to theme 1, theme 2, theme 4 and theme 6. In theme 3 we found four (4) cases and in theme 5 we found two (2) cases. We concluded, fundamentally, that most of the cases are found in theme 3 where the student puts the pronouns ―se e nos‖ in a post-verbal position when they should put it in a pre-verbal position because they are subordinate clauses. The first is a causal adverbial subordinate clause, the second is an adjective subordinate clause, the third is a predicative noun subordinate clause and the fourth is an adjective subordinate clause. The other two cases belong to theme 5 with the adverbs ―how and still‖, where the student puts the pronouns ―se e me‖ in a post-verbal position when they should put it in a pre-verbal position because they are clauses with adverbs without pause.